Rank 1
99Journal A — sample profile
- Scope
- 30/30
- Article type
- 20/20
- Methods
- 20/20
- Readiness
- 18/18
- Your preferences
- 11/12
Open accessAPC: ModerateMin readiness 70
Product
Aletvia Core: assurance, matching, routing, intelligence.
Four modules turn an unstructured search for a journal into an explainable routing decision — with the editorial decision left entirely to the publisher.
Aletvia Core
The four modules
Paper Assurance
Structured readiness assessment: manuscript structure, reporting completeness, methodological description, formatting and scope clarity. A manuscript is only routable once it is genuinely submission-ready.
Aletvia Match
Compares manuscript characteristics against each participating journal's Journal Demand Profile: scope, article type, methods, readiness and stated author preferences.
Aletvia Route
Presents a ranked, explained candidate set to the author. Every ranking factor is scientific or author-stated. Commercial relationships are excluded from the ranking function by design.
Publication Graph / Outcome Intelligence
Anonymised, aggregate intelligence on how routed manuscripts progress — designed to improve matching quality and give publishers honest reporting.
Routing architecture
How a manuscript moves through the network
Aletvia Match & Route
Publisher-neutral matching against journal demand profiles.
Matching compares manuscript characteristics with each journal's declared demand profile: scope, article types, methods, regions, access model, and current priority areas. Commercial relationships are excluded from ranking inputs. Authors see why each destination was suggested and choose for themselves.
Interactive demo
Aletvia Route simulator
Set manuscript characteristics and preferences to see how candidate journals are ranked and why. Journals shown are fictional placeholders and all data is illustrative.
Aletvia Route simulator
Describe a manuscript and see how fit components produce a ranking.
72
Rank 2
91Journal F — sample profile
- Scope
- 30/30
- Article type
- 20/20
- Methods
- 20/20
- Readiness
- 10/18
- Your preferences
- 11/12
Open accessAPC: HighMin readiness 80
Rank 3
66Journal E — sample profile
- Scope
- 30/30
- Article type
- 7/20
- Methods
- 6/20
- Readiness
- 18/18
- Your preferences
- 5/12
Subscription / hybridAPC: NoneMin readiness 50
Rank 4
59Journal B — sample profile
- Scope
- 6/30
- Article type
- 20/20
- Methods
- 6/20
- Readiness
- 18/18
- Your preferences
- 9/12
Open accessAPC: NoneMin readiness 55
Rank 5
58Journal D — sample profile
- Scope
- 6/30
- Article type
- 20/20
- Methods
- 6/20
- Readiness
- 15/18
- Your preferences
- 11/12
Open accessAPC: HighMin readiness 75
Rank 6
55Journal C — sample profile
- Scope
- 6/30
- Article type
- 20/20
- Methods
- 6/20
- Readiness
- 18/18
- Your preferences
- 5/12
Subscription / hybridAPC: NoneMin readiness 65
There is no commercial input in this score. Every component above is scientific, editorial, or author-declared. A publisher cannot buy a higher rank, and no amount of commercial relationship can move a journal above a better-fitting destination. Journal names are fictional sample profiles.
A higher-paying publisher can never outrank scientific or author fit.
Commercial terms are not an input to the ranking function. There is no bid, no paid placement and no revenue weighting. If a journal is not a fit, no commercial arrangement can make it appear as one.
Measurement
Qualified Manuscript Yield
The KPI Aletvia intends to measure in pilots — not a number we claim today.
Qualified Manuscript Yield = qualified manuscripts progressing beyond initial editorial screening ÷ Aletvia-referred qualified manuscripts
No baseline is published. Pilot metrics will be released only after validation with founding partners, using their anonymised outcome data and with their agreement.